Thursday, 2 April 2015

HKRT Olympic Qualifiers 香港代表隊在2016奧運外圍賽的表現

HKRT Olympic Qualifiers

Firstly I would like to acknowledge that the results of the Hong Kong U22 team in the recent Olympic qualifying tournament were disappointing; there is no doubt about that. Coach KIM to his credit has already apologized for the performance.


I have met with KIM today and asked for a detailed report on the competition by the end of next week. I will review the situation once I am in possession of all the facts. I will reserve some judgement on the Olympic qualifiers until I have had chance to digest the detailed report but I would like to make some initial observations.

The Coach and some of the players have mentioned that the lack of a training camp was a contributory factor in the poor performance and this seems to have been picked up by the media. I am not dismissing this completely because I appreciate the need for teams to bond and to play together to develop an understanding on the pitch. My view however is that this is more of an excuse than a reason. If anyone thinks that simply getting the team together for a few days would make the difference between losing three games and winning them, then they are just deluding themselves. If only it was that easy to solve. Unfortunately there are some more fundamental problems to address.

Before I describe these problems, I would like to address the question of money. Let’s be clear, funding was not the main reason why there was no overseas training camp. In recent years the money spent by the Technical Department on representative team training and competition has increased dramatically and quite rightly so. Next year it is set to increase even further. This year has been extraordinarily busy for our representative teams in that there has been an Asian Games, the East Asian Games and other tournaments, competitions and one off matches. This has coincided with the start of the Premier League. The start of the season was delayed and there have been other gaps in fixtures created by the representative team matches. Many of these have been outside the FIFA International match days. There is a limit as to how often the HKFA can stop the league whilst being fair to the clubs and maintaining the integrity and public interest in the League. The issue was not about money but about the availability of players. The HKFA has to balance often conflicting objectives and reach compromises. These are not always understood by everyone especially if they are coming from one perspective without the benefit of seeing the whole picture.

So what are these more fundamental issues.

Firstly anyone who knows anything about football knows that it takes at least 10 years to train somebody to be good enough to play international football. The individuals playing in this tournament were mostly born in 1993. The period of time most critical to their development was arguably when they were between 10 and 20 i.e. 2003 to 2013. I wasn’t here then but I understand from talking to people who were, that there was very little football development at that time. Basically the system failed this cohort of players and I attach no blame to the players whatsoever. They are passionate about football and try their best whenever they play for Hong Kong. The point is that the lack of systematic coaching, training and competitive opportunity during their formative years has left them significantly behind players from other countries in terms of technique, physicality and tactical awareness. It is impossible to make up that gap overnight. As someone who has been involved in sports development for 35 years, believe me, no overseas training camp is going to overcome these long term deficiencies.

Another factor that needs to be considered is how frequently and intensely this group of players train and play now. Young local players in Hong Kong do not play often enough for their clubs or train as intensely as they should. Most Premier League Clubs have their full quota of foreign players (6 in the squad, 4 on the pitch at any one time). In addition to that many clubs have players deemed to be local because they have a permanent ID card but they are not eligible to play for Hong Kong because they don’t have a Hong Kong passport. So there are actually very few eligible players playing in the Premier League, very few of them are under 23 and very few play in key positions. The HKRT coaches actually have a limited pool of players to pick from. Couple that to the fact that some (not all) clubs are reluctant to release players for regular training (or overseas camps), then the results are less surprising.

It must also be remembered that the facilities and support for elite football in Hong Kong remain inadequate in terms of both quality and quantity. It is more important than ever that we get a dedicated Training Centre and access to expert Sports Science support.

In summary, I would accept that if we had had the resources and the players available to attend a training camp, it would have helped. However, I do not accept that it would have made a significant difference to the outcome. There are much more basic fundamental problems to resolve. In the new Strategic Plan, Aiming High – Together, (a copy of which is on the website) I set out potential solutions to these issues including (but not limited to):
  • building a training centre
  • developing a football curriculum
  • introducing a more systematic development continuum with pathways for talented players
  • establishing regional centres of excellence
  • helping clubs to develop their own Academies
  • providing better sports science and medical support to elite players
  • providing player welfare and second career opportunities
  • entering a U22/23 team in the Premier League

There are so many things we should be doing better but it takes time to change things and put new people and systems in place. I understand that people want immediate results. I understand that people with a limited knowledge of football expect Project Phoenix to have solved these issues at a stroke. Expectations need to be managed because Hong Kong football has failed a generation of players and it cannot be solved overnight. We need to find additional resources to help us to implement the plans we now have in place. In time things will improve. In the meantime we need to be patient and give our full support to the players and coaches as they do their best to represent Hong Kong with pride. 

Everyone is disappointed that we failed to qualify, not least the players and coaches. Equally everyone at the HKFA is committed to making things better.      

Mark Sutcliffe April 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
香港代表隊在2016奧運外圍賽的表現
首先,本人承認香港二十二歲以下代表隊在最近出戰「2016奧運外圍賽」(2016亞洲足協23歲以下錦標賽外圍賽)之表現令人失望,而早前主教練金判坤先生亦對今次球隊的表現致歉。

今天本人與金教練就今次賽事進行了一次面談,並著他在下周內呈交是次賽事的詳細報告,本人集齊所有資料後便會立即進行檢討。待本人完全消化詳細的賽事報告後,便會為今次奧運外圍賽表現作出審視,但有一些個人觀點想在此先和大家分享。
教練以及部分球員曾經指出,沒有安排海外賽前集訓是其中一項令球隊成績強差人意的關鍵因素,此觀點傳媒也有提及。本人不會全盤否定這個說法,因為球隊需要在球場上培養默契和建立團隊精神,然而本人覺得這是一個藉口多於理由。假若有人認為球隊進行數天集宿,便可從一支三場不勝的球隊搖身變為長勝將軍,那只是自欺欺人的藉口。如果事實僅僅如此,相信問題不難解決,遺憾地卻有更多根本的問題需要處理。
在闡述各項問題之前,本人首先要談談有關資金的疑問。讓我們清楚一點,缺乏預算並不是一個沒有海外集訓的主因;近年本會的技術發展部用於香港代表隊的訓練和賽事的費用大幅增加,亦用得其所。下年度的資金將會更高。今年是香港代表隊非常忙碌的一年,有亞洲盃、東亞盃、其他賽事和一場過的比賽,還要加上新一屆香港超級聯賽。今屆香港超級聯賽延遲開鑼,而香港代表隊的賽事亦要加插在頻密賽程的空檔之中。當中很多代表隊賽事是在國際足協的國際賽期之外。要在對球會公平,並保持聯賽的完整性和公眾利益之下,本會不能頻繁地暫停聯賽的賽事,這不是資金的問題,是球員是否有空檔的問題。本會要平衡所有目標,有些目標可能有所衝突,需要作出妥協。這並不是所有人能夠理解,特別是當只從一個角度去看,並沒有考慮到整個情況的時候。
歸根究柢,有更多根本問題必須檢討。
首先,任何認識足球運動的人士都會明白,訓練一個人達致參加國際足球賽事的水平,最少需要十年。參加今次賽事的球員,大部分都是在一九九三年出生,他們發展的黃金周期應為十歲至二十歲之間,即二○○三至二○一三年。雖然未曾身處其中,但本人從不同人士理解到那個時期並沒有太多足球培訓發展;當時的訓練制度未能有效培訓這群球員,因此我無意對他們橫加指責。事實上,這群小伙子對足球充滿熱情,亦為代表香港而努力爭拼,只是在他們的成長之年缺乏有系統的正規訓練以及完善的競賽機會,導致他們在技術、體能以至戰術意識上,落後於鄰近國家地區的球員。他們不可能一夜之間脫胎換骨。作為一個曾經涉足運動發展長達三十五年的人士,請相信我,沒有任何一個海外訓練營能夠解開這個長期癥結。
其他因素包括這群代表隊成員參與訓練和比賽的強度和次數,本土的年青球員未必時常有機會代表球會參加比賽,又不常獲得足夠的強化訓練,這些都是他們所需的。大部分香港超級聯賽球會都會用上所有的外援名額 (在任何單一賽事中,六名外援出現在大軍名單中,而最多四名可以派遣上陣)。除此之外,在眾多球會中,有部分球員被視為本土球員看待,因為他們擁有香港永久居民身份證,但卻不符合代表香港參賽的資格,原因是他們沒有香港特區護照。因此,僅有少數符合代表香港出賽資格的球員參與香港超級聯賽,當中二十三歲以下和擔任核心位置的球員更寥寥無幾,所以香港代表隊教練只能在人員緊絀的名單中作出甄選,再加上部分球會(不是全部)不太願意讓旗下球員參與港隊的常規訓練(或海外集訓),因此成績自然欠奉。

另一點必須謹記的是,香港精英足球的設施和支援,無論在質素和數量方面依然乏善足陳。我們能否獲得專用的培訓中心,以及專門的體育科學支援,比起過往任何時候來得更為重要。
綜合所述,如果我們真的有資源讓球員參加賽前集訓,本人承認這可能對比賽有幫助,然而我並不認同賽前集訓會對結果帶來明顯的分別,還有更多根本的問題需要解決。在新的足球發展策略方案《力爭上游──萬眾一心》中(可在本會網站找到),已提及解決這些問題的可行方案,當中包括(此列並非全部方案)
  • 興建一個訓練中心
  • 發展一個香港足球課程
  • 推行更系統化的培育球員制度,讓有潛質的球員能走上晉升之路
  • 設立地區足球英才中心
  • 協助球會成立自己的足球學校
  • 為精英球員提供更好的運動科學和醫療支援
  • 提供球員福利和第二職業的機會
  • 於香港超級聯賽加入一支U22/23隊伍
當然,很多事情我們應該做得更好,但仍需要時間去作出改變,新人手和新制度也需時落實執行。本人理解人們希望效果立竿見影,亦明白人們期望鳳凰計劃可以一舉解決所有問題。然而我們要小心設定預期,因為香港足球過去已無法培育某一代的球員,這並不是一朝一夕可以解決的。我們需要找到額外的資源去幫助我們實行已經制訂了的計劃。隨著時間推進,情況會有所改善。在此期間,我們要耐心,全力支持球員和教練,因為他們已經為香港竭盡所能。
香港代表隊無法出線,不只是球員和教練,我們也感到失望。但在失望之餘,我們會繼續努力做得更好。
二○一五年四月  薛基輔   
註:中文譯本僅供參考之用,請以英文版本為準。
 
 

Thursday, 15 January 2015

The Wong Wai Case 黃威受傷事件


The Wong Wai Case

The time has come to defend both the HKFA and myself because there is so much confusion concerning the Wong Wai case.
Yet again I would like to reiterate that the player’s welfare remains our top priority. At the time of writing he remains in hospital and we wish him a quick and full recovery. He is a talented player and we all want to see him resume his career.

It is important for people to understand who is responsible for what happens when a player is injured playing for a Hong Kong representative team, so I will clarify the situation once and for all.
If a Football Association calls up a professional player to represent his country during one of the FIFA International Match Days then it is mandatory for the club to release the player. It is not mandatory for a club to release a player for training or friendly matches outside those days, but of course a club can choose to do so, on a voluntary basis.

Whenever a player is released by a club to the association, irrespective of whether it is mandatory or voluntary, the club is responsible for insuring the player against injury. It is not the responsibility of the football association.
The HKFA informed all of the clubs of this requirement at a meeting in October and gave them a copy of the relevant FIFA regulation.

It is also a mandatory requirement of the AFC CL and Hong Kong Premier League Club Licences that the club insures its players against injury.

The match in question was a friendly match that took place outside a FIFA match day and so the club released the player voluntarily. The HKFA never puts pressure on clubs to release players, it is the club’s choice. If a player gets injured the club is responsible for either claiming on its insurance policy (if it has one) or paying the medical expenses (if it does not). We have asked the club to provide us with a copy of its medical insurance certificate but as yet we haven’t received it. I honestly don’t know whether they are insured or not, time will tell. If they are not, it would explain why they are so keen to push the costs onto us.

Again for the avoidance of doubt the HKFA is in no way obliged to pay for any treatment. I can understand why people may find it strange that the Football Association is not responsible for insuring a player against injury or for paying for medical expenses, but that is the situation under the FIFA regulations and as a Member Association we have to abide by their rulings. The club cannot say that they were unaware of the situation for two reasons. Firstly we explicitly pointed out their responsibilities as recently as October and secondly they too have to abide by the FIFA regulations and it is incumbent on them to be aware of their obligations.

The situation regarding salary compensation is slightly different. If a professional player (male or female) is injured playing for a representative team in an “A” class international i.e. senior teams from both associations and the match takes place on a FIFA match day, then FIFA will provide financial assistance under the FIFA Club Protection Programme. This match was not covered by these provisions but again the club knew that because a copy of the FIFA Circular was given to all clubs in October.

Professional Football Clubs in Hong Kong are required by law to take out Employee Compensation Insurance to cover for when a player is injured and cannot work.

So for the case of Wong Wai, he was released by the club on a voluntary basis and the club fully understood (or at least should have) that if he got injured the HKFA was not obliged to pay for any medical expenses or to compensate the club.
So why did we offer to pay for Wong Wai’s medical expenses?

I took an ‘executive decision’ that the HKFA would pay for Wong Wai’s treatment for a number of reasons. Firstly a number of the HKFA coaches and our physiotherapist were involved in the decision to transfer Wong Wai from a public to a private hospital. This decision was taken in the interest of the patient. We wanted him to receive the best treatment which was something that may not have been covered by the club’s insurance. Having been party to this decision I felt that there was some moral obligation on us to pay at least some of the medical expenses. Secondly we did not want either Wong Wai or his family to worry about who was going to pay the bill. It was an emotional time for them and under the circumstances it seemed to me to be a secondary consideration. It is somewhat ironic that I may get into trouble with the Board for taking this decision and incurring expenditure that was not our responsibility. I will cross that bridge when I come to it.

Bearing in mind all of the above I think that the HKFA is justified in feeling disappointed with the media and public reaction. We were under no obligation to pay and yet we decided that that was the right thing to do. To be criticized for going over and above what we obliged to do and for helping out the player and the club seems a little harsh. I would have thought that the club should have shown some gratitude towards the HKFA, rather than stirring up controversy and making it out that we are the bad guys. When I met with them I asked for our discussions to be kept between the HKFA and the club. I did this not to keep matters ‘secret’ (which is what I have been accused of subsequently) but because I wanted to avoid the unnecessary media feeding frenzy. As a matter of principal I always prefer to sort things out amicably and confidentially. Unfortunately, the club decided that it could use the media and public to put further pressure on the HKFA and even went as far as to wrongly claim that I wanted to cap our liability in the Wong Wai case. This is a bit perverse considering we were not actually obliged to pay anything. It is also potentially counter-productive because we may decide not to be so generous in the future. It could be the other clubs and players that suffer as a result of the clubs actions. We are currently reviewing our position in relation to these matters and we will inform the clubs in due course as to what our policy will be in future cases.

I have also come in for some abusive personal criticism. I understand that this goes with the territory and that social media provides an ideal outlet for frustrations. I don’t mind criticism when it is justified but in this case I have been accused of visiting Wong Wai in hospital simply for PR reasons. People are entitled to interpret my actions as they wish. However I know my own personal motivations better than anyone. I simply wanted to personally reassure Wong Wai that the media comments were untrue and that the HKFA would honour its original commitment to pay his medical costs. I could not visit him any sooner because I was in Australia attending the AFC Conference on behalf of the association.

Wong Wai himself has been critical of my visit. This is disappointing in view of how much we have helped him and will continue to do so. I believe he is actually a decent person and I suspect that someone encouraged him to make that particular statement, so I am happy to give him the benefit of doubt on this occasion.

This has been a very unfortunate situation, not least for Wong Wai himself. With the benefit of hindsight I am sure there are things we could all have handled better. There are important lessons everyone and for me the most important one is to clearly define our policy in relation to the FIFA regulations and any additional arrangements we choose to have with the clubs. We have already started this process.



I will finish as I started in wishing Wong Wai well. I genuinely look forward to seeing him play once more for his club and for Hong Kong.

Mark Sutcliffe 15th January 2015

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

黃威受傷事件

由於外界對黃威受傷一事存有太多的錯誤的訊息,現在是時候需要為香港足球總會(本會)和本人辯護。
本人希望藉此重申,球員福利依舊是本會的重中之重,在執筆之時,黃威仍然在醫院接受治療,本人衷心希望他能夠早日康復。他是一名具天賦的年青球員,我們都樂於看見他能夠早日重返賽場。

必須讓公眾明白一點,當球員披上香港代表隊的球衣時而不幸受傷,責任該由誰去承擔。因此,本人將會在本文詳細釐清。

倘若足球總會徵召相關球會的球員代表其國家參與國際足協比賽日的比賽,球會必須按足球總會的要求而放人,至於在非國際足協比賽日的訓練或友賽,球會並非必須讓球員離隊參與,球會可按其意願讓其球員參加。

每當球會應允足球總會的要求讓旗下球員參與代表隊賽事時,不論出於自願與否,球會都必須為球員受傷承擔責任,而非由足球總會負責。

本會在去年十月舉行的會議中已通知各球會有關規定,並附上相關國際足協條例的副本。
同時,亞洲足協和香港超級聯賽的球會牌照申請要求,亦訂明球會必須就球員受傷購買保險。

這場賽事的爭議點是,這是一場在非國際足協比賽日舉行的友誼賽,球會按其意願讓球員參賽。本會強調,重未向任何球會施加壓力要求放人,這是球會的決定。倘若球員不幸受傷,球會應向保險公司索償(如有購買)或承擔醫療費用(如沒有購買保險)。本會曾經向球會索取其醫療保單副本,但迄今仍未收到。坦白說,本人並不清楚該球會有否購買保險,這只能留待時間驗證。假若沒有購買的話,則可以解釋為何他們如此積極將醫療費用推給本會。

為免產生疑問,本會重申沒有職責承擔任何醫療費用,外界可能會覺得足球總會毋須為球員受傷購買保險或賠償醫療費用而感到匪夷所思,本人明白他們的心情;但這是國際足協條例的規定,作為屬會會員的我們必須恪守相關制度,球會不能說他們毫不知情,原因有二:首先,去年十月時本會已向球會明確指出他們需要肩負的責任,其次是他們必須遵從國際足協條例,有義務去清楚知道他們的職責所在。
至於薪酬賠償問題,處理手法則有少許差異,假若一名職業足球員(無論男子或女子)於國際足協國際賽期內參與國際“A”級賽事而受傷,例如雙方總會各自派遣代表隊出戰,國際足協將會按照國際足協球會保障計劃為當事人提供財政援助。是次賽事並不在該條例的保障範圍以內,而球會亦已於去年十月收到國際足協通報副本,因此應已明瞭相關條例。

香港職業球會必須根據法例購買勞工保險,以確保球員一旦受傷和無法工作能得到保障。
故此對於黃威受傷一事,黃威所屬球會自願讓其參賽,而球會亦充分明白(或最低限度了解)到若球員在比賽中受傷,本會毋須為他的醫療費用或球會損失承擔任何責任。

為甚麼我們會承擔黃威的醫療費用?
本人作出了一個「行政決定」,讓本會承擔黃威的醫療費用,主要有以下原因:首先,本會數名教練及物理治療師均有份參與將黃威由公立醫院轉去私立醫院的決定,這是出於病者的利益著想。縱使球會保險未必能夠全面涵蓋所有費用,我們也希望他能夠獲得最好的治療。站在道義上的立場,本人認為我們應該承擔至少部分醫療費用。其次,我們不希望黃威或其家屬憂慮誰會承擔醫療費用的問題,他們的情緒不穩是我的另一個考慮因素;然而,這或會令本人與董事局產生意見分歧的兩難局面,產生的費用並不是我們應該肩負的責任。不過,諺語有云:「船到橋頭自然直!」

基於上述所言,本人認為本會對最近傳媒和公眾之抨擊言論深感失望是合乎情理的,本會確實毋須負責去支付相關費用,但我們仍作出認為正確的決定。因此,對於那些抨擊我們應該負上責任去幫助球會和球員的言論似乎是過分嚴苛,本人以為球會就此事向本會表達謝意,而非挑起一些爭議來營造“本會是壞人”的形象。當本人與他們會面時,曾要求就討論內容保密。我作出此要求並非因為要將事件秘密處理(這個要求成了後來對本人的指責),而是為了避免掀起不必要的傳媒追訪。基於這個原則,本人傾向於以友善和保密的方法處理此事。可惜,球會決定藉著傳媒和公眾的力量來進一步向本會施加壓力,並錯誤引述本人將在黃威受傷事件上設定賠償上限。基於我們本應毋須為醫療費用負責,球會這樣的做法實在有點有違常理,也會令事情適得其反,因此本會或決定在將來不作出如此慷慨的決定。其他球會和球員的利益或會因單一球會的莽撞行動而受損。本會正就事件重新審視我們應該扮演的角色,並會在適當時候通知球會有關在將來處理同類事件的相關政策。
本人也遭受到辱罵性的人身攻擊,本人明白到這種事情在社交媒體上屢見不鮮,網絡是一個宣洩不滿的理想平台。本人樂於接受任何合理的批評,但卻不能容忍去醫院探訪黃威一事被形容為一種公關手段,當然人們可以按他們的想法來解釋本人的行為,但卻沒有人比我更清楚自己的個人意願。本人去慰問黃威,純粹因為想向他強調傳媒的報道並不準確,以及本會會遵守承諾,負責他的醫療費用。本人未能及早前赴醫院探望,是因為本人當時正代表本會出席在澳洲舉行的亞洲足協會議。

黃威對於本人的探訪予以批評,對於一直幫助和支持他的我們感到非常失望。本人深信他是一位有分寸的人,因此我懷疑他是受到鼓勵而作出此番言論。就這件事件上,本人樂於將「疑點利益」歸於黃威。
這是一件非常不幸的事件,並不單指在黃威本人身上。事後一想,本人認為應能找出更妥善的方法來處理。經此一事,令大家上了重要的一課,我們必須根據國際足協條例,清楚釐訂本會的相關政策,以及與球會間的附加安排,本會經已開始草擬這些方案。


就如本文的開首所言,本人由衷希望黃威能夠早日康復,再次目睹他披上球會和香港代表隊的戰衣,騁馳於球場上爭取榮譽!
二○一五年一月十五日  薛基輔 

Friday, 19 December 2014

Christmas Wishes 聖誕祝願

Christmas Wishes

Thank you to everyone who has contributed positively to the development of football in 2014.  
I would like to wish all of the football ‘family’ in Hong Kong (players, fans, parents, coaches, referees, clubs, officials, the media, sponsors, partners etc) a peaceful and joyous Christmas and a happy and prosperous New Year. I am heading ‘down under’ for some rest and recuperation over the festive season and I will return to Hong Kong at the beginning of January refreshed and as keen as ever to continue the revival of Hong Kong football.

Season’s Greetings and Best Wishes,
Mark Sutcliffe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

聖誕祝願

本人對每一位曾經在二○一四年度為本地足球發展作出的努力和貢獻的人士致以衷心的感謝。

在此,本人祝願所有本地球圈的「家庭」成員(包括球員、球迷、家長、教練、裁判、球會、工作人員、傳媒、贊助機構、合作夥伴等等)有一個寧謐溫馨的聖誕佳節,並恭祝大家新年吉祥,諸事順遂!在節日期間,本人將會前赴澳洲稍作休息,然後來年一月便會重返香江,繼續為重振本地球壇而奮鬥!

敬祝大家節日快樂!

薛基輔

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Football; Beauty and the Beast 足球—美女與野獸

Football; Beauty and the Beast


I can’t remember a time when football wasn’t an important part of my life. One of my first memories is England winning the World Cup. I was four years old and I always mention this because it hasn’t happened since and may not happen again in my lifetime! I also vividly recall the excitement of my first live match on Boxing Day 1969, Burnley v Liverpool (a fixture which, coincidentally, will be happening again this year exactly 45 years later). Throughout my childhood, playing football in the school playground, the street and the park with my friends was an everyday occurrence that I took for granted. In one way or another either personally or professionally football has been a constant part of my life ever since and it’s fair to say that over the years it has developed into a bit of a love-hate relationship. That might sound odd, so let me explain.


The things I love about football:
  • It’s easy to play: One of the beauties of the sport is its simplicity. You can amuse yourself for hours with just a ball, kicking it against a wall, playing ‘keepy up’ etc. You don’t need much equipment and the rules are simple too so it’s easy to learn both the basic skills and how to play. With a ball and a bit of space, people can have a game, it’s that simple.
  • The simplicity belies its complexity and skill: Almost everyone can play football, however not every person, and certainly not every team, can play it well. I love the fact that to get really good you need to blend natural ability and hard work. Watching a top class player or team is like watching poetry in motion. It’s called the beautiful game because the sublime skills of the rare footballing geniuses are breathtaking. The fact that the fusion of talent, tactics and skills so rarely come together make it an even more joyous thing to behold when it does. Top players and teams make it look easy, but those of us who have played even at a moderate level know that it is anything but easy.  
  • It’s universal: I am an avid follower of other sports too. Cricket and rugby are among my favourites but they are not what I would call truly global. Football is arguably unique as a team sport in that it is played virtually everywhere. Of course its universal popularity is in part due to its simplicity. We shouldn’t underestimate this global appeal because as a potential power for good, football is well-placed to use its influence to promote harmony and goodwill.
  • It’s good for you and society: Playing football promotes positive health both physical and mental. If done correctly, training for and playing football makes you strong, fit, agile and flexible. It is good for your skeletal and cardio-vascular systems and reduces stress. Physical activity also enhances cognitive performance – it’s good for your brain too. A happy, healthy and engaged population is good for society.
  • Being part of a team: I retired from playing football as a veteran when I was in my mid 40s. My body told me to quit much earlier than that but I just loved the camaraderie and being part of a team. You can’t beat the adrenaline rush just before kick-off and for me, it’s not quite the same in individual sports. Whether you are a player or a fan, following a team can bring people together. Friendships made through sports teams tend to endure.
  • Football can be a metaphor for life: If you learn and play properly, football teaches you lots about life; how win with humility, how to lose with good grace. It teaches the benefits of teamwork and the direct causal relationship between effort and positive outcomes. Equally, you learn about overcoming adversity and how to treat other people with respect.

So I love football for many reasons but chiefly because of its inherent qualities of fun and excitement. At its best it embodies the essence of sport – healthy and pure competition between two teams where honest endeavour brings success.  



Football should always be a great experience on and off the pitch; unfortunately it just isn’t!   

The things I hate about football: 
  • Commercialisation: Football is often used by people with no empathy or love for it, as a ‘tool’ with which to make money. I guess this is no different to other industries, but I draw the line when it becomes ‘exploitation’ of players or fans or anybody else for that matter.
  • Greed: This can apply to TV companies, corporate bodies, agents, players, even Associations etc. There is a lot of money in football but only in a very few places. Some people can’t resist the temptation to line their own pockets rather than making sure scarce resources are distributed more equitably. 
  • Corruption: This takes a number of forms ranging from officials in power abusing their positions to match-fixers deliberately affecting the outcome of a match for personal gain. These people destroy the soul of football.
  • Cheating: I can’t abide cheats. Cheating takes many forms whether it is deliberately fielding an ineligible player, taking performance enhancing drugs, fixing a match or diving in the penalty area. One method of cheating that has got me incensed recently is players feigning injury, particularly to waste time as the final whistle gets near. I left a match before the end recently because I was so disgusted with the players antics. Do they have no shame? Everyone knows they are blatantly cheating but for me what makes it worse is that they don’t seem to care that they are also making themselves look pathetically weak falling over for no apparent reason; they must have no pride either. When this sort of behaviour is encouraged or condoned by coaches, as it frequently is, it makes it even worse and makes my blood boil. People tell me to ‘get over it’ or ‘it’s part of the game’. Actually it’s NOT! Faking injury is unsporting behaviour and is a cautionable offence. 
  • Hooliganism: Football has been blighted by physical attacks on people and property for many years. I have literally feared for my life on a few occasions, most notably when watching England in a World Cup qualifier in Rome in 1997 (watch the youtube videos and you will see why). I am one of the lucky ones; I’m still here to tell the tale. It’s a sad fact that here are still horrible people who use football as an excuse for a fight.
  • Discrimination: In the same way that football can connect people, it can also divide them. Football is often very ‘tribal’ in nature and this can result in prejudices of all kinds being voiced. It is important to distinguish between rivalry and open hostility. Unfortunately I have witnessed vile and unforgivable personable abuse at football matches based on many factors including; team allegiance, colour of skin, race, age, sex, orientation etc. For some reason you just don’t get this level of unnecessary abuse and naked aggression at other sports.   
  • It brings the worst out in some people: More often than not, football is a positive influence but occasionally it is also used as an excuse for a range of negative human traits such as hatred, arrogance, discourtesy and violence. There are perpetrated both on and off the pitch. For example look at Louis Suarez and his seemingly uncontrollable desire to bite opponents. The one that bothers me most off the pitch is the lack of respect shown by so-called ‘fans’ towards each other, players and officials. Believe it or not I have seen a mass brawl involving parents at a children’s match.

There is no doubt that football is and will remain a world-wide phenomenon and as such it will continue to embody every facet of human nature, good and bad. So I suppose I am destined to continue my love-hate relationship with football (because after all this time I can’t turn my back on it), at times reaching the heights of elation, wonder and joy and at other times plunged into despair, disgust and depression. I just hope my heart can take the highs and lows; a polarized range of intense emotions!



I consider myself fortunate to work in an industry with the potential to transcend barriers of all kinds and to unite people in a common passion. If everyone involved in football at every level made more effort to eradicate the negative influences, the ‘beautiful game’ would flourish. As a consequence, I sincerely believe that the world would be a much better place.


Mark Sutcliffe CEO November 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 足球—美女與野獸

本人從小就知道足球經已是我生活中一個不可或缺的部分。我最早的記憶之一是英格蘭贏得了世界盃冠軍,那時我只得四歲。本人時常強調此事,因為英格蘭再奪世界盃的希望或許在我的餘生中不會歷史重演。另一件深深印在我的腦海中的事情,就是我的第一次看現場球賽的情景,那是一九六九年拆禮物日舉利的聯賽賽事—般尼對利物浦(根據今年英超賽程,巧合地相隔四十五年後又再重演這一場對戰)!在我的童年生活中,每天都會在學校球場、街道、公園與朋友一起踢足球,我認為是理所當然的事情。不管怎樣,無論是個人或職業足球都已成為我生命上的重要一環。坦白說,多年後足球竟然發展成一個愛與恨的關係,似乎有點不合邏輯,請容我詳細解釋。

以下是本人愛上足球的原因:
  • 容易上手:足球運動其中一項最大的優點是其簡易性,你可以花上數小時自娛自樂,例如不停將皮球踢向牆上。整個過程毋須添置太多設備,而且條例簡單易明,只需掌握足球的基本技術及如何比賽經已足夠。一個足球和一小片空間,大家便可以進行比賽,就是這麼簡單!
  • 簡易性隱藏著複雜和技巧:幾乎每個人都能夠踢足球,然而並非每個人,以及每一支球隊能夠踢得出色。我愛上它的理由是:要踢得出類拔萃,必須同時揉合先天潛能以及後天努力。當觀看一些世界級球員或球隊比賽時,仿如欣賞著動感的詩篇般精彩,因此才稱得上「漂亮足球」,尤其遇上一些世間罕有的天才球員展示其上乘的足球技術時總會激動人心!當足球天分、戰術和技巧罕有地混合在一起時,能夠親身目睹自然是一樁美事。頂級球員和球會的表現看似得心應手,但其實大家心知肚明,這絕對不是一件易事,就算是一般球員亦難以做到! 
  • 全球性:本人在其他運動方面也是一名狂然的追隨者,板球和橄欖球亦是本人眾多的愛好之一,然而我不能將它們定位為全球化運動。毫無疑問,足球是一項隊際的運動,分布在全球每一個角落。誠然,基於足球的簡易性,幫助它主導了全球市場,我們不能低估這個擁有全球最大影響力的運動,全因它具有助人向善的潛能,運用足球的影響力以締造和諧善意的氛圍。
  • 對你和社會都有裨益:足球競技能夠促進個人的身心發展,如果適得其所的話,足球訓練和參加比賽會令你變得身體強壯、強身健體、身手敏捷以及動作靈活。同時,它能夠為你的骨骼和循環系統帶來健康發展,紓緩緊張。體育活動亦能加強認知表現,對你的大腦發展大有裨益。因此,一個開心、健康及積極的活動人口對整個社會都有良好的影響。
  • 成為球隊的一員:作為一名老將,本人在年屆四十左右便決定結束球員生涯。身體狀況本叫我得更早退下來,但我則喜歡作為球隊的一部分和珍惜隊友間的友情。在球賽開始前,你不能遏止腎上腺素急升,而我在不同運動上卻不會有相似感覺。無論你是一名球員或球迷,追隨球隊能夠將大家匯聚在一起,友情透過球隊的蔓延將持久不衰!
  • 足球能夠比喻人生:假若你能夠正確地學習及掌握足球技術,它會教曉你很多人生哲理—如何謙遜地取勝、如何大方地認輸等。此外,足球亦會教導一些團隊合作的好處以及直接的努力與回報關係。同樣地,你亦會掌握如何克服逆境以及尊重他人之道。
這就是我愛上足球的理由,但最重要的是它帶來了固有的歡樂和刺激,體現了運動的重要元素—兩支球隊在良性競爭的情況下,用盡全力爭奪錦標! 
 
足球總能夠為大家帶來球場內外非一般的精彩體驗;不幸的是,它並非只限於此!
以下是本人厭惡足球的原因: 
  • 商品化:足球時常被一些無情的人士利用,視它作為一種「工具」來賺錢。本人估計這種情況與其他行業無異;然而,當球員、球迷或其他人士被「剝削」時,我將會為此劃清界線。
  • 貪婪:它可以應用於電視機構、管治團體、代理公司、球員以至足球總會等。足球可以用來謀取更多的金錢利益,但僅限於小部分的地方身上。某些人難以抗拒金錢的誘惑而將所得利益據為己有,也不情願將有限的資源拿出來公平地分攤。 
  • 貪污:某些官員濫用職權,透過不同方式非法操控賽事,從而謀取私利。這些不法之徒的存在,徹底摧毀了足球的靈魂!
  • 欺詐:本人絕不能容忍欺詐行為。欺詐是可以透過不同形式出現,不論是球場上有不合參賽資格的球員、濫用藥物以催谷比賽狀態、非法操控賽事以至在禁區內「插水」等。最近,其中一種欺詐行為令我勃然大怒,有球員在賽事臨近完結前假扮受傷,意圖浪費時間,因此我提早離場,實在厭惡這類球員的惡行。難道他們沒有羞恥之心?每一個人都知道他們 招搖撞騙的技倆,但對於本人而言,更甚的是他們似乎未有意識到自己的差勁表現,亦不會因此而感到自豪。當教練時常鼓吹或默許球員作出這類行為時,情況將會變得愈加嚴重,足以令我氣血上升。有些人會告訴我去作出「妥協」或「將它視為比賽的一部分」。實際上我未能做到,「詐傷」絕對是不君子行為以及違背體育精神的原意。 
  • 足球流氓:多年來,足球流氓對其他球迷以及財產的攻擊,令足球運動蒙上污點!本人曾有數次感到劫後餘生的經歷,最令我印象深刻的是一九九七年在羅馬觀看英格蘭國家隊對陣意大利國家隊的世界盃外圍賽(有關片段可在youtube中查找),我是其中一名倖存者,得以在這裡講述悲慘的往事!不幸的是,現實上仍有不少恐怖分子以足球為借口,不斷製造襲擊事件。
  • 歧視:某程度上足球可以將人類聯繫在一起,同時亦可以分化他們。足球可以劃分為多個「部落」,因此有時會導致偏見的情況發生。我們必須明確分辨「競爭對立」和「公然敵意」的行為。本人不幸目睹在球場上發生的骯髒事件,包括因一些對球隊忠誠、膚色、種族、年齡、性別、意向等因素而向對方作出一些可恥以及不可原諒的人身攻擊行為。基於某種原因,你不會將這些不必要的人身攻擊行為,赤裸裸侵略在其他運動上。  
  • 令一些人士變得更糟: 在一般情況下,足球帶來正面的影響,但有時亦會牽引出一連串負面的人性特質,包括仇恨、傲慢、無禮及暴力傾向,而且已經滲入到球場內外。舉個例,蘇亞雷斯的「咬人」事件,反映他似乎難以自控地向對方球員作出咬人的行為;而另一個令我非常懊惱的是一些所謂「球迷」在球場外相互指罵對方的職球員,來本人曾經在一場少年賽事中親身目睹雙方家長激烈爭吵,真是信不信由你!
毫無疑問,足球全球化所帶來的影響深遠,它將會繼續突顯每一個人的真實性格,無論是好與壞。因此本人猜想自己與足球的愛恨關係將會持續下去(皆因經歷了多年的風風雨雨,實在難以割捨),有時足球會令人情緒高漲、手舞足蹈,有時又會將人打入痛苦的深淵,混雜著失望、沮喪、失落的心情。本人由衷希望我的心臟能夠承受這種情緒反差極大的狀況,畢竟足球正是影響心臟負載能力的「元凶」之一。
 
本人慶幸自己都夠從事這門行業,全情投入跨越重重障礙之餘,更可將志同道合者匯聚在一起。倘若每一位涉及足球事業不同領域的人士,都能夠加倍努力消除負面氛圍,相信「漂亮足球」將會復見。總括而言,本人仍然深信世界始終存在著美好的一面。
 
薜基輔
二○一四年十一月